Tumor Biology

Natural Female Hormone Balance Program

Natural Menopause Relief Secrets

Get Instant Access

Various biologic factors have been associated with prognostic significance in ovarian cancer. The role of ploidy in predicting outcome in ovarian cancer remains controversial. In many studies, diploid tumors have been associated with better survival rates. Recurrence-free survival of patients with DNA-diploid primary ovarian cancer was significantly better compared with that of patients with DNA-aneuploid tumors in univariate analysis (47% versus 18%; P = .01). The tumor-dependent overall survival rate of patients with DNA-diploid tumors was 57% compared with 30% with DNA-aneuploid tumors.62 Mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor genes have been found in epithelial ovarian cancer, but the clinical significance of p53 overexpression in ovarian carcinoma is uncertain. In univariate analysis, p53 overexpression was a significant prognostic factor. However, in multivariate analysis, after adjustment for stage and size of residual tumor following cytoreductive surgery, p53 overexpression did not retain statistical significance. Survival curves for patients with different stages and grades of tumor differentiation did not demonstrate a difference in survival among patients with no p53 overexpression compared with those who demonstrated any degree of p53 overexpression.63 Overexpression of the HER2/neu proto-oncogene occurs in 20% to 30% of ovarian epithelial cancers, in which it may be of prognostic significance. The incidence of HER2/neu amplification in late-stage (III-IV, 77%) is significantly higher than that in early-stage (I-II, 21%) invasive epithelial carcinoma and is associated with a worse prognosis.64 However, use of trastuzumab targeting the HER2/neu amplification has failed to show a benefit.65


1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al: Cancer Statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59:225-249, 2009.

2. Berek J: Epithelial ovarian cancer. In Berek JS, Hacker NF (eds): Practical Gynecologic Oncology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005, pp 443-509.

3. Ozols R, Rubin S, Thomas G, Robboy S: In Hoskins W et al (eds): Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005, pp 895-987.

4. Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE, et al: Gynecologic Oncology Group. Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 21(17):3194-3200, 2003.

5. Markman M, Bundy BN, Alberts DS, et al: Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 19(4):1001-1007, 2001.

6. Parham G, Phillips JL, Hicks ML, et al: The National Cancer Data Base report on malignant epithelial ovarian carcinoma in African-American women. Cancer 80(4):816-826, 1997.

7. Hartge P, Whittemore AS, Itnyre J, et al: Rates and risks of ovarian cancer in subgroups of white women in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 84:760-764, 1994.

8. Fathalla MF: Incessant ovulation-a factor in ovarian neoplasia? Lancet 2(7716):163, 1971.

9. Purdie DM, Bain CJ, Siskind V, et al: Ovulation and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 104:228-232, 2003.

10. Greene MH, Clark JW, Blayney DW: The epidemiology of ovarian cancer. [Review]. Semin Oncol 11(3):209-226, 1984.

11. Pelucchi C, Galeone C, Talamini R, et al: Lifetime ovulatory cycles and ovarian cancer risk in 2 Italian case-control studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(1):83.e1-83.e7, 2007.

12. Franceschi S, La Vecchia C, Booth M, et al: Pooled analysis of 3 European case-control studies of ovarian cancer: II. Age at menarche and at menopause. Int J Cancer 49(1):57-60, 1991.

13. La Vecchia C: Oral contraceptives and ovarian cancer: an update, 1998-2004. [Review]. Eur J Cancer Prev 15(2): 117-124, 2006.

14. Franceschi S, Parazzini F, Negri E, et al: Pooled analysis of 3 European case-control studies of epithelial ovarian cancer: III. Oral contraceptive use. Int J Cancer 49(1):61-65, 1991.

15. Gross TP, Schesseleman JJ: The estimated effect of oral contraceptive use on the cumulative risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 83(3):419-424, 1994.

16. Rosenblatt KA, Thomas DB: Lactation and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Int J Epidemiol 22(2): 192-197, 1993.

17. Gwinn ML, Lee NC, Rhodes PH, et al: Pregnancy, breast feeding, and oral contraceptives and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 43(6):559-568, 1990.

18. Ness B, Cramer DW, Goodman MT, et al: Infertility, fertility drugs, and ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 155(3):217-224, 2002.

19. Rossing MA, Tang MT, Flagg EW, et al: A case-control study of ovarian cancer in relation to infertility and the use of ovulation-inducing drugs. Am J Epidemiol 160(11):1070-1078, 2004.

20. Shoham Z: Epidemiology, etiology and fertility drugs in ovarian epithelial carcinoma: Where are we today? Fertil Steril 62:433448, 1994.

21. Dor J, Lerner-Geva L, Rabinovici J, et al: Cancer incidence in a cohort of infertile women who underwent in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 77(2):324-327, 2002.

22. Venn A, Jones P, Quinn M, Healy D: Characteristics of ovarian and uterine cancers in a cohort of in vitro fertilization patients. Gynecol Oncol 82(1):64-68, 2001.

23. Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Welch WR, et al: Noncontraceptive estrogen use and epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol 130(6):1142-1451, 1989.

24. Lacey JV, Jr, Mink PJ, Lubin JH, et al: Menopausal hormone replacement therapy and risk of ovarian cancer. JAMA 288(3):334-341, 2002. Erratum in: JAMA 288(20):2544, 2002.

25. Moorman PG, Schildkraut JM, Calingaert B, et al: Menopausal hormones and risk of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(1):76-82, 2005.

26. Glud E, Kjaer SK, Thomsen BL, et al: Hormone therapy and the impact of estrogen intake on the risk of ovarian cancer. Arch Intern Med 164(20):2253-2259, 2004.

27. Anderson GL, Judd HL, Kaunitz AM, et al: Women's Health Initiative Investigators. Effects of estrogen plus progestin on gynecologic cancers and associated diagnostic procedures: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA 290(13): 1739-1748, 2003.

28. Lacey JV, Jr, Brinton LA, Leitzmann MF, et al: Menopausal hormone therapy and ovarian cancer risk in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(19):1397-1405, 2006.

29. Boyd J: Specific keynote: hereditary ovarian cancer: what we know. [Review]. Gynecol Oncol 88(1 Pt 2):S8-S10, 2003; discussion S11-S13.

30. King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB: New York Breast Cancer Study Group. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302 (5645):643-646, 2003.

31. Szabo CI, King MC: Population genetics of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 60(5):1013-1020, 1997.

32. Rubin SC, Blackwood MA, Bandera C, et al: BRCA1, BRCA2, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer gene mutations in an unselected ovarian cancer population: relationship to family history and implications for genetic testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178(4):670-677, 1998.

33. Robles-Diaz L, Goldfrank DJ, Kauff ND, et al: Hereditary ovarian cancer in Ashkenazi Jews. Fam Cancer 3(3-4):259-264, 2004.

34. Lynch HT, Casey MJ, Lynch J, et al:: Genetics and ovarian carcinoma. [Review]. Semin Oncol 25(3):265-280, 1998.

35. Risch HA, Jain M, Marrett LD, Howe GR: Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(18):1409-1415, 1994.

36. Cramer DW, Liberman RF, Titus-Ernstoff L, et al: Genital talc exposure and risk of ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 81(3):351-356, 1999.

37. Wong C, Hempling RE, Piver MS, et al: Perineal talc exposure and subsequent epithelial ovarian cancer: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 93(3):372-376, 1999.

38. Whittemore AS, Wu ML, Paffenbarger RS, Jr, et al: Personal and environmental characteristics related to epithelial ovarian cancer. II. Exposures to talcum powder, tobacco, alcohol, and coffee. Am J Epidemiol 128(6):1228-1240, 1988.

39. Olsen CM, Green AC, Whiteman DC, et al: Obesity and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 43:690-709, 2007.

40. Chang ET, Canchola AJ, Lee VS, et al: Wine and other alcohol consumption and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study cohort. Cancer Causes Control 18(1):91-103, 2007.

41. Peterson NB, Trentham-Dietz A, Newcomb PA, et al: Alcohol consumption and ovarian cancer risk in a population-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 119(10):2423-2437, 2006.

42. Risch HA, Howe GR: Pelvic inflammatory disease and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4(5):447^51, 1995.

43. Yoshikawa H, Jimbo H, Okada S, et al: Prevalence of endome-triosis in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 50(Suppl 1):11-17, 2005.

44. Webb PM, Purdie DM, Grover S, et al: Symptoms and diagnosis of borderline, early and advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 92(1):232-239, 2004.

45. Olson SH, Mignone L, Nakraseive C, et al: Symptoms of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 98(2):212-217, 2001.

46. Munoz KA, Harlan LC, Trimble EL: Patterns of care for women with ovarian cancer in the United States. J Clin Oncol 15(11): 3408-3415, 1997.

47. Nguyen HN, Averette HE, Hoskins W, et al: National survey of ovarian carcinoma. VI. Critical assessment of current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system. Cancer 72(10):3007-3011, 1993.

48. Chan JK, Urban R, Cheung MK, et al: Ovarian cancer in younger vs older women: a population-based analysis. Br J Cancer 95(10): 1314-1320, 2006.

49. Rodriguez M, Nguyen HN, Averette HE, et al: National survey of ovarian carcinoma XII. Epithelial ovarian malignancies in women less than or equal to 25 years of age. Cancer 73(4):1245-1250, 1994.

50. Thigpen T, Brady MF, Omura GA, et al: Age as a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma. The Gynecologic Oncology Group experience. Cancer 71(2 Suppl):606-614, 1993.

51. Sorbe B, Frankendal B, Veress B: Importance of histologic grading in the prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 59(5):576-582, 1982.

52. Sherman ME, Mink PJ, Curtis R, et al: Survival among women with borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian carcinoma: a population-based analysis. Cancer 100(5):1045-1052, 2004.

53. Heintz A, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al: Carcinoma of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Obstet 95(Suppl 1):S161-S192.

54. Bristow RE, Montz FJ, Lagasse LD, et al: Survival impact of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 72(3):278-287, 1999.

55. Chi DS, Eisenhauer EL, Lang J, et al: What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)? Gynecol Oncol 103(2):559-564, 2006.

56. Hoskins WJ, McGuire WP, Brady MF, et al: The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(4):974-979, 1994; discussion 979-980.

57. Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, et al: Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 20(5):1248-1259, 2002.

58. Cooper BC, Sood AK, Davis CS, et al: Preoperative CA125 as a prognostic factor in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. APMIS 114(5):359-363, 2006.

59. Memarzadeh S, Lee SB, Berek JS, Farias-Eisner R: .CA125 levels are a weak predictor of optimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13(2):120-124, 2003.

60. Markman M, Federico M, Liu PY, et al: Significance of early changes in the serum CA-125 antigen level on overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103(1):195-198, 2006.

61. Bast RC, Jr, Xu FJ, Yu YH, et al: CA 125: the past and the future. [Revised]. [Int J Biol Markers 13(4):179-187, 1998.

62. Kimmig R, Wimberger P, Hillemanns P, et al: Multivariate analysis of the prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy and S-phase fraction in ovarian cancer determined by flow cytometry following detection of cytokeratin-labeled tumor cells. Gynecol Oncol 84(1):21-31, 2002.

63. Eltabbakh GH, Belinson JL, Kennedy AW, et al: p53 overexpression is not an independent prognostic factor for patients with primary ovarian epithelial cancer. Cancer 80(5):892-898, 1997.

64. Wong YF, Cheung TH, Lam SK, et al: Prevalence and significance of HER-2/neu amplification in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 40(3):209-212, 1995.

65. Bookman MA, Darcy KM, Clarke-Pearson D, et al: Evaluation of monoclonal humanized anti-HER2 antibody, trastuzumab, in patients with recurrent or refractory ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma with overexpression of HER2: a phase II trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 21(2):283-290, 2003.

Was this article helpful?

0 0
Get The Body Of Your Dreams

Get The Body Of Your Dreams

Everybody wants to lose weight. This is one fact that is supported by the countless weight loss programs on the market along with the numerous weight loss products, ranging from snack bars, powdered juices, shakes and even slimming soaps and lotions.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment